December 2007 Global Cooling

Global cooling coming?

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com .

I agree that we are in for a change of climate to the cooler side based upon the very low solar activity of the present solar cycle but EXPERTS have been trying to predict future activity with very little to no consistency. Without any scientific data and associated knowledge your predictions are nothing but guesswork. However, but stock in manufactures of warming blankets!

As Charlie Martin says … when it comes to science … folks have to ignore ideology-first politics … and accept the “cold equations.”

What the cold equations of radiation transport say is simple: the effects of solar variability are much smaller than carbon-driven AGW.

That’s why space physicists are particularly excited about these developments, but climatologists aren’t.

Meanwhile, as every space-faring nation on earth sees with their own satellites, Arctic ice melting is proceeding at a record rate.

The observed accelerating melting is exactly what “the cold equations” say will happen … no matter what the solar cycle does.

That is why ideology-first brands of conservatism, that are too morally and intellectually feeble to accept “the cold equations”, cannot survive in the 21st century … because (as Richard Feynman put it) “Mother Nature cannot be fooled.”

URL: http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/

“What the cold equations of radiation transport say is simple: the effects of solar variability are much smaller than carbon-driven AGW.

Man Made Global Cooling is cancelling out Man Made Global Warming ...

And not only is man made global cooling cancelling out man made global warming ... there has been no global warming since 1998 ... which, of course, has the Warmists' panties all in a bunch over the fact that they can't account for the lack of warming.

Related: A peer reviewed admission that "global surface temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2008' -- Dr David Whitehouse on the PNAS paper Kaufmann et al.

Climate of Corruption, Politics and Power Behind the Global Warming Hoax

Red Hot Lies, How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed

SuperFreakonomics, Illustrated Edition, Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance

A Climate for Change, Global Warming Facts for Faith-Based Decisions

SuperFreakonomics LP, Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance